Home > Read Error > Raw Read Error Rate Sata Cable

Raw Read Error Rate Sata Cable


Really good work.  next page → Home Categories FAQ/Guidelines Terms of Service Privacy Policy Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled Support Downloads Knowledge Base German Spanish Italian French Home What you did was just a drive erase (writing zeros, presumably, to every LBA). Streaming... SuperSoph_WD Heiseh KiiNFeb 24, 2015, 9:48 AM ex_bubblehead said: First thing is to replace the SATA cable. get redirected here

To be honest, WD quality control is starting to piss me off. Is it because WD does not provide technical documentation to their own support staff? It was hard to do on my Fractal Design R3 case, as it allows wiring on the back-side, but I've done so and my Samsung HD-204UI hard drive has Not reported I was working on a project then suddenly the computer started to slow down (I had many applications running), so I closed some of them and just for precaution, I ran

Raw Read Error Rate Fix

sub mesaJul 26, 2009, 3:18 PM All times, without ECC your harddrive doesn't know what its storing. hard disk sentinel detect a raw read error 1 week ago but now it desaaperard how ?? GREAT way to catch physical defects BEFORE you use the drive with actual data. RMA it if you can, sell it if you cant as its a drive that will die on you sooner rather than later and you should not trust it.

Seeing the attributes before and after matters -- it can help shed light on if your erasing actually repaired/fixed problems (specifically induced LBA remapping).5. So, it's probably the cable and not a physical problem and I shouldn't worry as long as the number stays the same?! I just regret choosing WD in the first place. What Is Raw Read Error Rate If we assume a linear relationship, then it would appear that each point represents approximately 4000 counts.

You should be able to get a replacement product, just make sure you backup the data beforehand. Raw Read Error Rate 1 I've checked SMART data like 1 week before, and it was raw read error rate:0. Therefore, in order for the normalised value to hit the threshold of 51, the drive would need to record about 600,000 counts. Found it out right on search results.

While you're in there reseat all connections to the drive by removing, then replugging, don't simply push on them. Raw Read Error Rate Hdd If two out of three utilities say it's okay, I'd be inclined to believe them (and those specifically are pretty good diagnostics/testing tools). And best of all, I GOTTA PAY SHIPPING FOR YOUR HORRIBLE QUALITY CONTROL? and i too had my drive for the same amount of time and it rapidly got worse real fast..

Raw Read Error Rate 1

Until WD's acquisition, SiliconSystems' technical datasheets were available to the general public. values back to normal. Raw Read Error Rate Fix Oh and i almost forgot my old drive DID get a failure code on DLGDiag for DOS too. Raw Read Error Rate Western Digital Fix For example, My CrystalDiskMark benched at 500MB is 132MB/s Read and 127MB/s write.  All online review shows this drive SHOULD be around 143MB/s Read and 135MB/s write.

Therefore I wouldn't be surprised if WD's helpdesk staff are not privy to the same technical data that was available to us in my day. Get More Info Don't feel bad, you're not alone in this regard -- it's very common, and there is a lot of software out there that tries to "interpret SMART" but does it entirely or start making backups ASAP? While trying to find a fix/answer, I remembered that when I initially got the drive it was running fine and not reporting any errors - even during hours of disk tests Raw Read Error Rate Fail

I tried to "repair the sectors" (no details of how you did this). 40% of the drive was bad (no details provided). and do you have cables that have two small bumps or similar so they click into place ? I'm about to start up Samsung's own diagnostic tool. useful reference the view where it shows you each one and a column where it says, last hr, last 24hrs, last week, etc Because i usually look at that view the most and

That will be very kind of you to take a snap shot of the benchmark. Read Error Rate Crystaldiskinfo No bloody way ! More RMA?

In other words, its normal that the raw read error count is quite high.

During that period, I've run uTorrent for hours, run disk check, played HD videos, and did regular browsing etc as well. Are WD's engineers not aware that Seagate's and WD's SMART attributes are completely different? Seriously read teh feedback here.. Hd Tune Pro This is just nice.

Related Resources Raw Read Error and Multizone error rate is failing WD Lifeguard Raw Read Error Rate in S.M.A.R.T. The SMART report on these drives actually doesn't show the write error rate, but the raw read errors and all other SMART attributes it reports are doing fine. __________________ #7 And of course I'm not mishandling the drives in any way, so I don't know where those g-sense errors came from. this page Disproving Euler proposition by brute force in C Why was Toph put in a wooden cell in the Fire Nation city in Season 3 Episode 7?

and THEN when these people RMA their drive they get ANOTHER bad drive too ? Featured SponsorsSponsor ShowcasesAquatuningAsusFeenixSound BlasterView MoreSelect OneAquatuningAsusFeenixIn WinSound Blaster Recent Reviews See All the Latest Reviews RockIt Delidder Reviewed by Duality92 I got this product from the creator as a testing and data corruption issues.. SuperSoph_WD Yeah, I tested with CrystalDiskInfo, HD Tune and Sentinel and they all say it's ok.Just wondering if those values will be a problem on the near future.

thats really crappy ! What should I do?