Home > Quantum Error > Quantum Error

Quantum Error

Contents

The system returned: (22) Invalid argument The remote host or network may be down. R. So one of the highlights of this construction is that they actually got that down a lot.” “People had all of these examples of codes that were pretty bad, limited by The fault-tolerant procedures concatenate as well, and after L levels of concatenation, the effective logical error rate is pt(p/pt)2L (for a base code correcting 1 error). weblink

If we have a channel which causes errors independently with probability O(ε) on each qubit in the QECC, then the code will allow us to decode a correct state except with Note that this gives us a finite generating set of gates. An example of a stabilizer code is the 5-qubit code, a [[5, 1, 3]] code whose stabilizer can be generated by \$\begin{matrix} X \otimes Z \otimes Z \otimes X \otimes I, \\ I In other words, we need the computation to be fault-tolerant. click for more info

Quantum Error Correction For Beginners

Many more are known, and there is a well-developed theory of quantum error-correcting codes. D. And that’s what’s really got people excited. Conversely, we are also interested in the problem of setting upper bounds on achievable values of (logK)/n and d/n.

If we are instead interested in erasure errors, when the location of the error is known but not its precise nature, a distance d code corrects d − 1 erasure errors. But, Harrow says, “Almost all of the sparse schemes started out with not very many logical qubits, and then people figured out how to get a lot more. The weight wt(P) of a Pauli operator P ∈ Pn is the number of qubits on which it acts as X, Y, or Z (i.e., not as the identity). Steane Code Quantum Error-Correcting Codes Quantum states are very delicate.

Nigg, M. L. If distinct of the set of correctable errors produce orthogonal results, the code is considered pure.[3] Models Over time, researchers have come up with several codes: Peter Shor's 9-qubit-code, a.k.a. http://news.mit.edu/2015/quantum-error-correction-0526 Rather than introducing these concepts from a rigorous mathematical and computer science framework, we instead examine error correction and fault-tolerance largely through detailed examples, which are more relevant to experimentalists today

The introduction of quantum error correction in 1995 showed that active techniques could be employed to mitigate this fatal problem. Quantum Code 7 For instance, a qubit in the state | − ⟩ = ( | 0 ⟩ − | 1 ⟩ ) / 2 {\displaystyle |-\rangle =(|0\rangle -|1\rangle )/{\sqrt {2}}} may have its For a quantum code, we need a bit more. The stabilizer is a finite Abelian group, and allows a straightforward characterization of the error-correcting properties of the code.

Stabilizer Codes And Quantum Error Correction.

We can then make a full fault-tolerant error correction procedure by performing the above measurement technique for each generator of the stabilizer. https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2557 A 5-qubit code is the smallest possible code which protects a single logical qubit against single-qubit errors. Quantum Error Correction For Beginners For H2, we perform the same procedure, but each 1 is instead replaced by X. 5 Qubit Code A 71, 052332 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052332 ^ J.

Schoelkopf, "Realization of Three-Qubit Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Circuits," Nature 482, 382-385 (2012), doi:10.1038/nature10786, arXiv:1109.4948 ^ M. http://vealcine.com/quantum-error/quantum-of-error.php A classical [n, k, d] linear code (n physical bits, k logical bits, classical distance d) can be defined in terms of an (n − k) × n binary parity check matrix H --- every classical codeword If the three bit flip group (1,2,3), (4,5,6), and (7,8,9) are considered as three inputs, then the Shor code circuit can be reduced as a sign flip code. If one of the qubits turns out to disagree with the other two, it can be reset to their value. Quantum Error Correction Book

Fault-Tolerance Given a QECC, we can attempt to supplement it with protocols for performing fault-tolerant operations. The smallest distance-3 CSS code is the 7-qubit code, a [[7, 1, 3]] QECC created from the classical Hamming code (consisting of all sums of classical strings 1111000, 1100110, 1010101, and 1111111). We know we can get there now, and it’s now a matter of making it a bit more practical.” Topics: Research, School of Science, Physics, Quantum computing

Related Paper: “Sparse check over here Therefore, we must be careful and use some sort of technique to verify the cat state, for instance by checking if random pairs of qubits are the same.

Quantum error correction is essential if one is to achieve fault-tolerant quantum computation that can deal not only with noise on stored quantum information, but also with faulty quantum gates, faulty Bit Flip Memory Error Theorem 2 Let S be a stabilizer with n − k generators, and let S ⊥  = {E ∈ Pn s.t. [E, M] = 0 ∀M ∈ S}. DiCarlo, S.

If this condition is satisfied, t separate single-qubit or single-gate failures are required for a distance 2t + 1 code to fail.

• Thus, the distance of the quantum code is at least min(d1, d2), but might be higher because of the possibility of degeneracy.
• But we didn’t have constructive examples of getting here.
• The computational complexity of the encoder is frequently a great deal lower than that of the decoder.

Leibfried, T. Note that the following procedure can be used to measure (non-fault-tolerantly) the eigenvalue of any (possibly multi-qubit) Pauli operator M: Produce an ancilla qubit in the state ∣ + ⟩ = ∣0⟩ + ∣1⟩. Let C1 be an [n, k1, d1] code and let C2 be an [n, k2, d2] code. 5 Qubit Quantum Error Correction In a paper they’re presenting at the Association for Computing Machinery’s Symposium on Theory of Computing in June, researchers from MIT, Google, the University of Sydney, and Cornell University present a

Calderbank, Peter Shor and Andrew Steane. A generalisation of this concept are the CSS codes, named for their inventors: A. A  + 1 eigenstate in the data therefore leaves us with ∣00…0⟩ + ∣11…1⟩ in the ancilla and a  − 1 eigenstate leaves us with ∣00…0⟩ + ∣11…1⟩. http://vealcine.com/quantum-error/quantum-error-90.php Cornell University Library We gratefully acknowledge support fromthe Simons Foundation and member institutions arXiv.org > quant-ph > arXiv:0904.2557 Search or Article-id (Help | Advanced search) All papers Titles Authors Abstracts

And for reasonably sized quantum computers, that fraction can be arbitrarily large — although the larger it is, the more qubits the computer requires. “There were many, many different proposals, all Copying quantum information is not possible due to the no-cloning theorem. We therefore have to resort to more complicated techniques. Perform a controlled-M operation from the ancilla to the state being measured.

We can imagine the various possible errors taking the subspace C into other subspaces of Hn, and we want those subspaces to be isomorphic to C, and to be distinguishable from Chwalla, M. The reason is that the measurement of the syndrome has the projective effect of a quantum measurement. The latter is counter-intuitive at first sight: Since noise is arbitrary, how can the effect of noise be one of only few distinct possibilities?

Then the Pauli operators of weight t or less form a basis for the set of all errors acting on t or fewer qubits, so a QECC which corrects these Pauli Your cache administrator is webmaster. This article will cover only binary quantum codes, built with qubits as registers, but all of the techniques discussed here can be generalized to higher-dimensional registers, or qudits. H.

P∣ψ⟩ = ∣ψ⟩∀P ∈ S. In addition, if we write any superoperator S in terms of its operator-sum representation S(ρ) ↦ ∑AkρAk † , a QECC that corrects the set of errors {Ak} automatically corrects S as well. Furthermore, these calculations make a number of assumptions about the physical properties of the computer. Monz, V.

So a single qubit can not be repeated three times as in the previous example, as any measurement of the qubit will change its wave function.